Breast Lift and Reshaping
Not only raising the nipple, but redistributing breast tissue and supporting the new breast structure
A breast lift is usually described as an operation that raises the nipple and removes excess skin. That description is accurate but incomplete. A ptotic breast is not simply a breast whose nipple sits low. It is a breast in which the tissue itself has settled downward and laterally, the skin envelope has stretched, and the support that held the breast structure has weakened. An operation that addresses the skin alone improves appearance for a time, but does not change how the tissue beneath it is distributed.
What determines breast shape
Volume and shape are separate variables. Two breasts of identical volume can look entirely different depending on how the tissue within them is distributed. In a youthful breast the tissue is relatively concentrated centrally and in the upper pole, and the skin envelope fits the volume it contains. Over time, after pregnancy and breastfeeding, after weight loss, or simply with age, the tissue migrates downward and laterally, the envelope remains wide, and upper pole fullness is lost.
The practical consequence follows from this. Removing skin tightens the envelope but does not return the tissue to its former position. To change shape in a way that lasts, the breast tissue itself must be redistributed, concentrated centrally, and the resulting structure supported. This is accepted thinking in breast surgery rather than an approach unique to this practice.
Who a breast lift suits
A lift suits women whose volume is adequate but whose shape has changed. The common reasons are changes after pregnancy and breastfeeding, significant weight loss that has left a wide skin envelope and deflated tissue, age-related change, and the situation following implant removal, where tissue displaced laterally by the implant remains spread across the chest wall.
Where fullness itself is lacking, and not only shape, the question changes. In those cases a lift combined with an implant is considered, or a lift alone with a realistic expectation of the volume that will result. That decision is made at consultation, after examination, rather than in response to a general request for a lift.
The approach I use: multilevel reshaping
The approach I work by was developed together with Dr. Amiram Borenstein and is based on rebuilding the breast structure from the bottom upward. Rather than relying on the skin as the principal means of support, the tissue itself is constructed in layers. The laterally displaced tissue is mobilised inward toward the centre of the breast and sutured to itself to form supporting pillars. The lateral pillar is secured to the pectoralis fascia, so that the reconstructed mound is anchored to the chest wall rather than suspended from the skin. The skin is closed last, over a structure that already supports itself.
The sequence of the operation. The pillars of breast tissue are brought together and anchored, the tissue is then imbricated to narrow the breast and increase projection, and the skin is closed last over a structure that already holds its own shape.
The imbrication step is the part of the operation that most directly changes shape. Thin dermal flaps are raised on either side of the vertical limb, and horizontal sutures are placed at the exposed tissue edges above the pillars. As these are tightened the breast is narrowed from the sides and projection increases, without the skin being asked to create that shape under tension.
Two practical consequences follow. Tension on the skin at closure is lower, which matters both for the scar and for how stable the result remains over time. And the lateral tissue, which in other approaches is either left where it lies or excised, is used instead to create central fullness and reduce the width of the breast.
Planning and marking
Planning is done before the operation with the patient upright, since the breast behaves differently under gravity than it does lying down. The width of the breast, the position of the nipple relative to the inframammary fold and the amount of skin to be removed are assessed and marked at that stage. During the operation the patient is moved to a sitting position to confirm nipple position and final shape.
Preoperative marking. The breast is supported and displaced by hand so that the planned position can be transferred accurately.
Where implants are in place and the question is whether to exchange them, that decision is considered separately. About implant exchange →
A lift after implant removal
The situation after implant removal is the extreme form of the same problem. The implant expanded both the breast tissue and the skin envelope over years, and once it is removed what remains is wide, spread tissue without the mound the implant created. The principle is the same, though the tissue available to work with is different. This is covered on a separate page on implant explantation and breast reshaping.
Recovery and what to expect
The operation is performed as day surgery. Patients are discharged the same day, and I do not use drains routinely.
Recovery is easier than recovery from breast augmentation. The reason lies in what is done during the operation: there is no manipulation of or injury to the pectoralis muscle and its fascia, where pain receptors are most dense, and there is no stretching or expansion of the tissues of the kind an implant requires. Most patients operated on before the weekend are driving and managing ordinary daily activity, including desk work, within a few days. Full physical activity resumes gradually after roughly four to six weeks. Final shape settles over three to six months, as swelling subsides and the tissues take their new position. The scar improves considerably over twelve to eighteen months.
It is worth being clear about what the operation does not do. A breast lift does not add volume, does not halt future changes in the tissue, and does not prevent the effects of age, pregnancy or weight change that come after it. It alters the distribution of the tissue that is present and the support given to it.
Published work
The principles described here were published in three open access papers. The first described the approach in breast reduction, in a retrospective series of 338 operations from Dr. Borenstein's clinic:
Borenstein A, Friedman O. Multilevel Breast Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 338 Breast Reduction Surgeries.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(8):e2427.
Read open access ↗
The second described the same principles applied to implant removal and breast reshaping:
Borenstein A, Friedman O. Combined Breast Implant Explantation and Multilevel Mastopexy Technique.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(9):e2429.
Read open access ↗
The third described the maneuver used to narrow the breast and add projection, and its application in breast reduction, mastopexy, augmentation mastopexy and oncoplastic reconstruction:
Borenstein A, Friedman O. The Borenstein Maneuver: A Surgical Technique to Narrow the Breast and Add Projection.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(3):e2631.
Read open access ↗
This operation is one application of a principle common to several breast operations. About breast reshaping →
Book a Consultation
39 Shaul HaMelech Blvd, Tel Aviv | Building B, Floor 3
Limor Alaluf, Clinic Manager, will be happy to assist